IMPLIKATUR PERCAKAPAN DALAM GELAR WICARA  “SENTILAN SENTILUN” DI METRO TV

Wiwiek Dwi Astuti

doi:10.26499/jk.v13i2.306

IMPLIKATUR PERCAKAPAN DALAM GELAR WICARA “SENTILAN SENTILUN” DI METRO TV

Wiwiek Dwi Astuti

Abstract

Attitudes and ideas conveyed through verbal forms may not necessarily be attitudes and meanings, but can be different or even contrary to what is stated. Submission of intent is what is known as the implicature of conversation. The utterances are analyzed to describe (1) the function of the conversation implicature in talk show of sentilan sentilun episode of ‘Siapa Ikut Gerobak’, and (2) the violation of cooperative principle and/politeness principle in the talkshow. ’The method used is listening and note taking. The findings related to the function of implicature is the use of representative (assertive), directive (imposive), expressive, commisive, and declarative utterance. The violation of cooperative principle with all the maxims is clearly seen in encountering and language games (joke).

Keywords

conversation implicature; violation of cooperative principle; maxim; talkshow

Full Text:

PDF

References

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1976). Text and context: Explorations inf the Semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London dan New York: Longman.

Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: Implicature, presupposition, and logical form. New York: Academic Press.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. Dalam Cole P. dan J.L. Morgan, 1975: 41-58.

Grundy, P. (2007). Doing pragmatics. Second edition. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.

Gunarwan. (2006). Implikatur dan kesantunan berbahasa: Beberapa tilikan dari sandiwara ludruk. Dalam PELBA 18. Jakarta: Unika Atmajaya.

Kesuma, T. M. J. (2007). Pengantar (metode) penelitian bahasa. Yogyakarta: Carasvatibooks.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. New York: Longman Inc.

_______. (1993). Prinsip-prinsip pragmatik. Terjemahan M.D.D. Oka. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.

Levinson, S. C. (1987). Pragmatics. Cambridges: Cambridge University Press.

Mustafa, S. M. (2010). The interpretation of implicature: A comparative study between implicature in linguistics and journalism. Dalam Journal of language teaching and research, Vol. 1, No. 1, hlm. 35-43. Finland: Academy Publisher Manufactured.

Nadar, F.X. (2009). Pragmatik dan penelitian pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Nugraheni, Y. (2010). http://Jurnal Unimus.ac.id. Analisis implikatur pada naskah film Harry Potter and The Goblet if Fire. Diunduh pada tanggal 14 November 2017.

Kusumawati, E. F. (2010). Implikatur percakapan dalam karikatur Sukribo pada Harian Kompas Edisi Hari Minggu Bulan Januari—Februari 2010. Skripsi. Fakultas Keguruan dan Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Pageyasa, W. (2012). Mengungkap maksud tersembunyi pertanyaan anak usia 5 tahun dalam percakapan keluarga. Kandai 8(1), 13-23.

Rustono. (1998). Implikatur percakapan sebagai penunjang pengungkapan humor di dalam wacana humor verbal lisan berbahasa Indonesia. Disertasi. FIB UI.

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosopy of language. Cambridge: University Press.

Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa: Pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Wijaya, I. D. P. (1996). Dasar-dasar pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zamzani. (2007). Kajian sosiopragmatik. Yogyakarta: Cipta Pustaka.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/jk.v13i2.306