REPRESENTASI MITOS BATIYANAN PADA MASYARAKAT BANJAR

Rissari Yayuk

Abstract


This study aims to describe the use of myth in the Banjar culture. Myth contains implicit communication purpose and meaning that can be known through the study of pragmatic study. The problems in this study are 1) how does the representation of Banjarese myth base on the form of communication? 2) how does the representation of Banjarese myth base on the communication function? The aims of this study are to describe 1) the representation of batiyanan myth in Banjar society base on the form of communication. 2) the representation of batiyanan myth in Banjar soiety base on the communication function. This research is a qualitative research using descriptive method. The data are taken from Banjarese speech in Kampung Jawa, Sekumpul, Martapura Regency. The data are taken from January 2017 to June 2017. Data collection techniques are note taking and interviewing. Data collection techniques are interview and documentation. This study uses three steps of work, they are (1) providing data; (2) data analyzing; and (3) presenting the results of the data analysis. This study uses pragmatic theory. The results conclude that 1) base on the form of communication, the representation of batiyanan myth in Banjar society consists of indirect speech with declarative structure in the form of directive speech and commisive; 2) base on the communication function , the representation of batiyanan myth in Banjar society consists of advice function happens if the speakers try to give advice, prohibition function happens if there is prohibition marker, satire function happens if the speaker intend to criticize the speech partner indirectly, and threats function happens if the speech has violation meaning and it cause something bad happen in the future.

 


Keywords


representation; pragmatic; myth; Banjar

Full Text:

PDF

References


AlBarry, (2001). Kamus ilmiah populer. Surabaya :Arloka

Alhairini 1, dkk. “Gambaran perilaku ibu hamil terhadap pantangan makan suku Toraja di kota Makassar tahun 2013”. http://repository.unhas.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/6761/jurnal.pdf;sequence=1. Diakses pada tanggal 24 Juli 2018.

Danandjaja, James. (1986). Folklor Indonesia. Jakarta: Grafiti.

Dhavamony, Mariasusai. (1995). Fe-nomenologi agama. Yogyakarta: IKAPI.

Djajasudarma, T. Fatimah. (2010). Metode linguistik. Bandung: Refika Aditama

Ganie, Tajuddin Noor, (2015). Kamus mitos Banjar. Kediri: FAM Publishing

Hapip, Djebar. (2011). Kamus Banjar Indonesia. Banjarmasin: CV Rahmnat Hafiz Al Mubaraq

Herusatoto, Budiono. (2008). Simbo-lisme Jawa. Yogyakarta: Om-bak.

Kasnodihardjo1 dan Lusi Kristiana2 (2013). Praktek budaya perawatan kehamilan di Desa Gadingsari Yogyakarta. Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi Vol. 3 No 3, Desember (2012): 113 – 123. Yogyakarta.

Khasanah, Nur Fita. (2017). “Hubungan tingkat kepercayaan terhadap mitos tentang makanan dalam kehamilan dengan ukuran lingkar lengan atas ibu hamil di Puskesmas Umbulharjo I”. Skripsi. Jogyakarta: Program Studi Jenjang Diploma Iv Bidan Pendidik Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas ‘Aisyiyah Yogyakarta.

Kridalaksana, H. (2008). Kamus linguistik. Jakarta: Gramedia

Malinowski, Bronislow. (1954). Myth in primitive psichology. dalam magic, science and religion. New York.

Murniah, Dad. (2008). “Mitos dan realitas sosial dalam sastra Tolaki “dalam Bunga rampai kesastraan. hlm. 1-13. Kendari: Kantor Bahasa Sulawesi Tenggara.

Nadar, F.X. (2009). Pragmatik dan penelitian pragmatik. Yogya-karta: Graha Ilmu

Pranowo. (2012). Berbahasa secara santun. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rahardi R. Kunjana. (2005). Pragmatik Jakarta: Erlangga.

Roibin. 2007. Agama dan mitos: Dari imajinasi kreatif menuju realitas yang dinamis.

Sawirman, dkk. (2014). Linguistik forensik. Padang: Andalas Univesity

Sawirman. (2005). Simbol lingual teks politik Tan Malaka: Elaborasi, signifikasi, dan transfigurasi interteks. Disertasi. Program Linguistik Pasca Sarjana Universitas Udayana, Denpasar

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa. Yogya-karta: Duta Wacana University Press

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta

Suryatin, Eka. (2016). ”Analisis tindak tutur pada baliho kampanye calon legislatif pemilu tahun 2009 di Kalimantan Selatan”. Undas. Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Bahasa dan Sastra. Vol.12, No.1, Juni 2016.

Tarigan, Henry Guntur. (2009). Pengajaran Pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa

Tim. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa In-donesia, edisi keempat. Ja-karta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Tim. (2008). Kamus bahasa Banjar Dialek Hulu-Indonesia. Banjarmasin: Balai Bahasa Banjarmasin.

Wijana, I Dewa Putu. (2006). Pragma-tik. Surakarta : Yumna Pustaka

Yulianto, Agus. (2016). “Pemaknaan simbol dalam mitos asal-usul nama Banjarmasin. Sebuah analisis strukturalisme Levi Strauss”. Undas. Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Bahasa dan Sastra. Vol. 12. No. 1. Juni 2016.

Yunis, M. (2010). Dekonstruksi mitos kehamilan. Padang: Minang-kabau Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/und.v14i1.1136

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.26499/und.v14i1.1136.g659

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.