Praktik Sosial Budaya pada Berita Online Rencana DPR Mencetak Uang untuk Menanggulangi Dampak Covid-19

Agik Nur Efendi, Mubayyamah Mubayyamah

Abstract


This study aims to explain sociocultural practice in a news text about the DPR's plan to print money to overcome the impact of Covid-19 on the May 2020 edition of the online news portal. This news is interesting because it involves figures arguing with each other, even criticizing money printing plans. The news involved Dahlan Iskan criticizing and opposing the DPR's proposed money printing plan. The news is analyzed based on the assumption that the social context that exists outside the media influences the discourse that appears in the news. The source of this research data is found in the online news Kompas.com, Detik.com, and Republika.com May 2020 edition. The method used in this study is descriptive qualitative with a critical approach to norman Fairclough's model. The great point of concern of Fairclough is to see language as a social practice. The results of this study show that in the situational aspect there is a contra between Dahlan Iskan and the discourse raised by the DPR from the Golkar faction who asked to print money. There are two social aspects of the discourse battle. First, if the issuance of new money worth 600 trillion will cause inflationary impacts. Secondly, the discourse battle can be said to have a bit of an inner conflict between Dahlan Iskan and Soetrisno Bachir.

 

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memaparkan sociocultural practice dalam suatu teks berita seputar rencana DPR mencetak uang untuk menanggulangi dampak Covid-19 pada portal berita online edisi Mei 2020. Pemberitaan ini menarik karena melibatkan tokoh-tokoh yang saling beradu argumen, bahkan mengkritik rencana pencetakan uang. Berita tersebut melibatkan Dahlan Iskan yang mengkritik dan menentang rencana pencetakan uang yang diusulkan DPR. Berita tersebut dianalisis berdasarkan asumsi bahwa konteks sosial yang ada di luar media memengaruhi wacana yang muncul dalam berita. Sumber data penelitian ini terdapat pada berita daring Kompas.com, Detik.com, dan Republika.com edisi bulan Mei 2020. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif dengan pendekatan kritis model Norman Fairclough. Titik perhatian besar dari Fairclough adalah melihat bahasa sebagai praktik sosial. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa dalam aspek situasional terdapat hal kontra antara Dahlan Iskan terhadap wacana yang dimunculkan oleh DPR dari fraksi Golkar yang meminta mencetak uang. Terdapat dua aspek sosial dari pertarungan wacana tersebut. Pertama, bila penerbitan uang baru senilai 600 triliun akan menimbulkan dampak inflasi. Kedua, pertarungan wacana tersebut dapat dapat dikatakan ada sedikit konflik batin antara Dahlan Iskan dengan Soetrisno Bachir.


Keywords


Sociocultural Practice; News; Covid.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Antara & Cahyani, D. R. (2020, June 4). Sri Mulyani Hanya Targetkan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi 1 Persen - Bisnis Tempo.co. Tempo.Co. https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/1349410/sri-mulyani-hanya-targetkan-pertumbuhan-ekonomi-1-persen

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2019). Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia Triwulan II-2019 Tumbuh 5,05 Persen.

Baker, P. (2012). Acceptable bias? Using corpus linguistics methods with critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(3), 247-256.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688297

Blackledge, A. (2005). Discourse and power in a multilingual world. John Benjamins Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.15

Boldyrev, N. N. . & D. O. G. (2016). Sociocultural specificity of discourse: the interpretive approach to language use. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 236, 59-64.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.12.019

Chouliaraki, L. . & F. N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh University Press. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/2863/

Dijk, T. A. Van. (1990). Social Cognition and Discourse. In H. Giles, & R. P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology and language (pp. 163-183).

Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. LKiS.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. Addison.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368

Fauzan, U. (2013). Analisis Wacana Kritis Model Fairclough. Jurnal Pendidik, 5(2).

Firmansyah, T. & E. D. (n.d.). Cetak Uang Baru Rp 600 Triliun, Berbahayakah? Republikas]. Retrieved September 9, 2020, from https://republika.co.id/berita/q9re8q377/cetak-uang-baru-rp-600-triliun-berbahayakah 3 Mei 2020 Elba Damhuri

Gee, J. P. (2015). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses (5th ed.). Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722511

Halliday, M. A. K. . & H. R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford University Press.

Hamdani, T. (n.d.). Dahlan Iskan Ikut Komentar soal DPR Ngotot Cetak Uang Rp 600 T. Detik.Finance.Com. Retrieved September 9, 2020, from https://finance.detik.com/moneter/d-5017684/dahlan-iskan-ikut-komentar-soal-dpr-ngotot-cetak-uang-rp-600-t

Hardiman, F. B. , & S. F. K. (2009). Menuju masyarakat komunikatif: ilmu, masyarakat, politik, & postmodernisme menurut Jürgen Habermas. Kanisius.

Idris, M. (n.d.). Dahlan Iskan Heran Alasan DPR Ngotot RI Cetak Uang Rp 600 Triliun Halaman all - Kompas.com. Retrieved September 9, 2020, from https://money.kompas.com/read/2020/05/13/053133726/dahlan-iskan-heran-alasan-dpr-ngotot-ri-cetak-uang-rp-600-triliun?page=all

Iskan, D. (n.d.). Uang Besar-DI's Way. Retrieved September 9, 2020, from https://www.disway.id/r/930/uang-besar

Johnson, M. . & M. N. (2019). Using sociocultural discourse analysis to analyse professional discourse. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 267-277.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.04.003

Martin, J. R. . & R. D. (2007). Working with discourse 2nd edition. Continuum.

Mercer, N. (2010). The Analysis of Classroom Talk: Methods and Methodologies... - Google Scholar. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 1-14.

https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X479853

Morand, D. A. (2000). Language and power: An empirical analysis of linguistic strategies used in superior-subordinate communication. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 235-248.

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<235::AID-JOB9>3.0.CO;2-N

Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2005). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203993712

Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & Joseph, G. O. G. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. In Review of Educational Research (Vol. 75, Issue 3, pp. 365-416). SAGE Publications Inc.

https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003365

Santoso, A. (2012). Studi bahasa kritis: Menguak bahasa membongkar kuasa. Mandar Maju.

Stamou, A. G. (2018). Synthesizing critical discourse analysis with language ideologies: The example of fictional discourse. Discourse, Context & Media, 23, 80-89.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.04.005

WHO. (2020). Indonesia: WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard | WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/region/searo/country/id

Worldometer. (2020). Coronavirus Cases. Worldometer. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.23.20018549V2

Wortham, S. . & R. C. R. (2015). The Handbook of Narrative Analysis (pp. 160-177). Wiley-Blackwell.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118458204.ch8

Zaidi, A. (2012). Language of ideology/ideology of language: Notes on theory and practice. Journal of Postcolonial Cultures and Societies ISSN, 3(1), 1948-1853.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v12i1.2788

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.