KEKOHESIFAN TEKS PUISI TAUFIK ISMAIL

NFN Basori

Abstract


Many researchers have discussed cohesion. However, they do not relate the cohesion with reader's understanding. This paper aims to identify the types of cohesion markers, semantic behaviors, and functions as an integrator of poetry. Poetry is chosen as the object of study because poetry requires density of language. Assuming that language density has given greater role of cohesion markers in poetry. The data are Taufik Ismail’s poems.The selection of the data is based on assumption that Taufik Ismail poetry can represent poetry genre in general. Analysis result shows that there are cohesion marker types used in poetry which are different from types of cohesion in other discourse. The differences lie in dominance of relation conjunction, repetition, antonymy, and collocation. Cohesion marker behavioral so indicates differences. There is conjunction contradiction in the form of semantic gap that is not found in other discourse types. Semantic gap, conflict of situations, repetition, antonymy and collocationare some instruments to strengthen poetic effect of a poem. The five forms are used by the poet to strengthen irony in the poem. These instruments probably are not important in other discourse types.

 


Keywords


cohesion markers; semantics; function; irony; poem

Full Text:

PDF

References


Azis, A.W. (2015). Pemarkah kohesi leksikal dan kohesi gramatikal.Dialektika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Matematika,1(1), 71-85.

Basori. (2011). Implikatur Ironi dalam Puisi-Puisi Taufik Ismail. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung.

Black, E. (2006). Pragmatic Stylistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Cruse, D.A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Halliday, M.A.K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R. (1984). Language, context, and text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. (Asruddin Barori Tou, penerjemah) Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Indiyastini, T. (2012). Kesatuan topik wacana prosedural resep masakan dalam bahasa Jawa.Widyaparwa 40(1),33-41.

Ismail, Taufik. (1999) Malu aku jadi orang Indonesia (MAJOI). Jakarta: Yayasan Indonesia.

Lamusu, S. A. (2010). Telaah stilistika puisi-puisi Rendra & Taufik Ismail.Jurnal Inovasi 7(2),33-45.

Rasyid. A. (2015) Kohesi gramatikal dalam prosa Toraja. Sawerigading,21(3),405-413.

Sasangka, S.S.T.W. (2016). Kohesi gramatikal dalam ragam bahasa perundang-undangan.Kandai,12(1),71-84.

Sukoyo, J. (2012). Analisis wacana percakapan berbahasa Jawa di jejaring sosial Facebook: Kajian kohesi. Widyaparwa,40(2),21-28.

Sumadi. (2016). Satuan lingual penanda tokoh sentral dalam kekohesifan wacana cerita pendek Indonesia. Widyaparwa,44(2), 110-121.

Sunarsih, T.A. (2015). Kohesi pada novel the naked face dan wajah sang pembunuh karya Sidney Sheldon. Widyaparwa,43(2), 189-198.

Wijana, I D. P. dan Rohmadi, M. (2009) Analisis wacana pragmatik: Kajian teori dan analisis. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.

Zaimar, O. K.S. & Harahap, A.B. (2015). Teori Wacana. Jakarta: Penaku.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/jk.v13i2.175

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

 

Jalan Haluoleo, Kompleks Bumi Praja, Anduonohu, Kendari 93231

Telepon(0401) 3135289, 3135287

pos-el: kandaisultra@gmail.com

 



-->