METAFORA ANTROPOMORFIK DALAM TUTURAN BAHAPAKAN KAKANAKAN PADA BAHASA BANJAR
Abstract
This research uses a qualitative descriptive method. The research problems are 1. How are the form and meaning of anthropomorphic metaphor image found in the speech of children in Banjar? 2. What politeness principle is violated in the speech hapakan (mockery) of children in Banjar language? The purpose of this research is to describe the form and meaning of anthropomorphic metaphor image found in the speech of hapakan (mockery) of children in Banjar. The benefit of this research is to develop a vision of Banjar Language for education and society in general, especially concerning to the problem of linguistic politeness. The technique used in this paper is the purposive sampling, the sampling technique of data source collection with consideration. The samples collected as data are three expressions that have the form and meaning of anthropomorphic metaphor. Stage of data analysis is data collection, data identification, classification, selection and interpretation. This stage must correspond to the theory. It is also interrelated each other. The results of data analysis are presented in plain words with technical terminology. The results of this study illustrate the forms and meanings of anthropomorphic metaphoric images found in the speech hapakan (mockery) of children in Banjar language including the word muha batimpap "two-faced", talinga rinjingan "to eavesdrop", and mata maling “steal a glance”. There is politeness principle violated in hapakan (mockery) of children language in Banjar.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akbari, Siti. (2016). Metafora dalam Berita Olah Raga pada Harian Banjarmasin Post.dalam Bunga Rampai Kebahasaan. Hal 139-154. Banjarbaru. Balai Bahasa Kalimantan selatan
Chaer, A. & Agustina, L. (2010). Sosiolinguistik. Jakarta: Rineka
Chaer, Abdul. (2010). Kesantunan Berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka
----- (2009). Pengantar Semantik Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka. Cipta.
Djajasudarma, T. Fatimah. (2010). Metode Linguistik. Bandung: Refika Aditama
Ibrahim, Abdul Syukur. (1993/1995). Kajian Tindak Tutur. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional
Jumadi. (2006). Representasi Kekuasaan. Jakarta. Pusat Bahasa.
Jumanto. (2017). Pragmatik, dunia linguistic tidak selebar daun kelor. Yogyakarta: Morfalingua
Karim, dkk.(2012). Semantik Bahasa Indonesia, teori dan latihan. Jakarta: PT. Pustaka Mandiri.
Kridalaksana, H. (2008). Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: Gramedia
Lubis, Hamid Hasan. (2015). Analisis Wacana Pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa.
Parera, J.D. (2004). Teori Semantik. Erlangga:Jakarta
Rahardi, R. Kunjana. (2005). Pragmatik. Jakarta:Erlangga
Ratna, Nyoman Kutha. (2016). Stilistika. Yogyakarta: Pustaka pelajar
Rusminto, N.E. (2009). Analisis Wacana Indonesia. (Buku Ajar) Bandar. Lampung: Universitas Lampung.
Sudjana, Nana dan Ibrahim. (2011). Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung: Sinar Baru Agrasindo
Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugono, D., dkk. (2008). KBBI edisi keempat. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Sumolang, Olga Grace. (2015). Metafora Dalam Lirik Lagu Karya Adele.Skripsi. Manado. Universitas Sam Ratulangi Fakultas Ilmu Budaya
Tharik WS, Afdol dan Darmawan W. (2016). Metafora dalam Lirik Lagu Dangdut: Kajian Semantik Kognitif. Dalam Jurnal Arkais. Jurnal UNJ. hal 5-15. Vol.7.No.1. Edisi Januari-Juni 2016.
Tim. (2008). Kamus Bahasa Banjar Dialek Hulu-Indonesia. Banjarmasin: Balai Bahasa Banjarmasin
Ullmann, Stephen. (2011). Pengantar Semantik, diadaptasi oleh Sumarsono, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Wibowo, Wahyu. (2015). Konsep Tindak Tutur Komunikasi. Jakarta:Pelita Aksara
Wijana, I Dewa Putu. (2010). Pragmatik. Surakarta : Yumna Pustaka
Yayuk, Rissari. (2013). Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesantunan Supir Angkutan Umum Jurusan Martapura. Prosiding Seminar Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan Yokyakarta.Yoyakarta: Balai Bahasa Yogyakarta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/tt.v12i2.1089
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
-->