POLA REPRESENTASI PIHAK ISRAEL DALAM ENSIKLOPEDIA BRITANNICA

NFN Sunarsih

Abstract


The existence of Israel generates many discourses in so many media and in various points of view. One of the media writing about Israel is Britannica, an internationally high-reputed encyclopedia. Since the intellectual competence is embedded to Britannica, every article published in it may be considered as academically correct. This paper is aimed at analyzing the patterns of Israeli representation in Britannica by applying corpus-based critical discourse analysis (a method combining critical discourse analysis and linguistic corpus). The patterns are analyzed from the concordance of a key word “Israeli(s)” and the collocation around the key word. The results of the study showed that Britannica represents Israel as a powerful military force, as a country that runs democracy, as a country with complete governmental institutions, as one of the main actors of regional conflict, and as the side which affords the conflict end.  The patterns found tend to be paradoxical each other because the bad and good side of Israel are represented interwovenly. It implies that Britannica does not construct Israel as entirely black or white.


Keywords


corpus-based critical discourse analysis; pattern of representation; concordance; collocation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahsanu, M. (2013). Permohonan maaf Aceng yang tidak termaafkan: analisis wacana dengan pendekatan interdisipliner. Kandai, 9(1), 36-48.

Anthony, L. AntConc for Windows 3.4.4. Tokyo: Waseda University.

Baker, P. (2008). Using Corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.

Darma, Y.A (2009). Analisis wacana kritis. Bandung: Yrama Widya dan FPBS UPI.

El-Hussari, I.A. (2007). President Bush’s address to the nation on U.S. policy in Iraq: A Critical discourse analysis approach. A paper presented at the Political Linguistics Conference at Warsaw University, Warsaw, Poland, 13-15 September 2007.

Gabrielatos, C. (2014). Corpus approaches to discourse studies: The Basics. Edge Hill University.

Gabrielatos, C. & Duguid, A. (2014). Corpus linguistics and CDA: A Critical look at synergy. CDA20+Symposium, Amsterdam, 9 September 2014.

Jacobson, M. (2007). Legitimization and the discursive (re)production of social domination: Case study of British political discourse and the Israeli occupation of Palestine. Articulos, Num 11, 34-55.

Kandil, M. (2009). The Israeli-Palestinian conflict in American, Arab, and British media: Corpus-Based critical discourse analysis. Dissertation in the College of Arts and Sciences, Georgia State University.

Leeuwen, T. van. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tool for critical discourse analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sunarsih. (2010). Analisis wacana kritis terhadap profil Israel dan Palestina dalam ensiklopedi digital Microsoft Student Encarta 2009. Tesis. Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

_____. (2017) Pola representasi pelaku, tindakan, dan legitimasi dalam wacana. Disertasi. Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta

Venuti, M., & Riccio, G. (2008) War-on-terror and the war in Iraq: Collocational profile of war in the CorDis Corpus. Universita degli

Studi di Napoli Federico II. Critical Aproaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 2008. University of Hertfordshire, 10 Juli 2008.

Yaghoobi, M. (2009) A critical discourse analysis of selected Iranian and American printed media on the representations of Hizbullah-Israel war. Journal of Intercultural Communication, Issue 21, October 2009.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/jk.v13i2.191

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

 

Jalan Haluoleo, Kompleks Bumi Praja, Anduonohu, Kendari 93231

Telepon(0401) 3135289, 3135287

pos-el: kandaisultra@gmail.com

 



-->