KEKERABATAN BAHASA KULAWI DAN BAHASA KAILI DI SULAWESI TENGAH

Siti Fatinah

Abstract


Kaili dan Kulawi languages are related and predicted they descent from common ancestral language (proto-language). Their relation need to be proved in qualitative and quantitative methode. This research applied and those methode in describing the relation between the languages. The aim of the research is describing the relation in qualitative and quantitative method. The data is based on questions and interviews which are elaborated into questionnaire with 200 Swadesh list and 873 culture vocabularies. The paper is applied method of comparative through lexicostatistic and reconstruction. The result of the paper indicates that Kaili dan Kulawi languages are in the same family languages with cognate percentage 62%. It indicates that those languages are in the same stock. The relationship of Kaili and Kulawi languages in the same family of languages proved by the qualitative data of sound correspondence, such as (1) l ≈ ɺ / - V#; (2) s h / - V#; (3) `g `k / - V#; (4) s x / # -; (5) ɓ ≈ b / # -; (6) J d / # -; -V#; (7) l ll / V-V; (8) J ≈ ʧ/ -V#; and (9) P B / # -.


Keywords


Kaili language; Kulawi language; family; correspondence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anceaux, J. C. (1965). Linguistic theories about Austronesian homeland. BKI 23, 417-431. Terjemahan Sudariyanto: FS UGM.

Anttila, R. (1972). An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. New York: Macmillan.

Budasi, I. G. (2007). Hubungan kekerabatan bahasa-bahasa Sumba. Disertasi. Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Bynon, T. (1977). Historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crowley, T. (1983). An introduction to historical linguistics. Port Maresby: University of Papua New Guinea Press.

______. (1987). An introduction to general linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Durasid, D. (1990). Rekonstruksi protobahasa Barito. Disertasi. Fakultas Pascasarjana Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.

Dyen. (1978). Subgrouping and reconstruction. Dalam Mohammad Ali Jazayery, (Ed), (hlm. 32-53).

Fernandez, I. Y. (1988). Rekonstruksi proto bahasa Flores. Disertasi. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.

Jeffers, R. J. & Lehiste. (1979). Principles and methods for historical linguistics. Massachusetts, London, England: MIT Press.

Kaseng, S, et al. (1979). Bahasa-bahasa di Sulawesi Tengah. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Lehmann, W. P. (1973). Historical linguistics: An introduction. New York. Holt, Rinehart, And Winston.

Mahsun. (2007). Metode penelitian bahasa: Tahapan strategi, metode, dan tekniknya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Masyhuda, Masyhudin. (1972). Bahasa Kaili Pamona: Pengelompokan bahasa di Sulawesi Tengah berdasarkan leksikostatistik. Palu: Yayasan Kebudayaan Sulawesi Tengah.

Mbete. A. M. (1990). Rekonstruksi proto Bali-Sasak-Sumbawa. Disertasi. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

Nothofer, Bernd. (1975). The reconstruction of proto Malayo-Javanic. VKI 73, Den Haag: Martinus Nijholff.

Sneddon, J.N. (1995). Situasi linguistik di pulau Sulawesi dalam PELLBA 8. hlm. 139-175. Editor: Soejono Dardjowidjojo. Jakarta: Lembaga Bahasa UNIKA Atma Jaya.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/jk.v13i2.245

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

 

Jalan Haluoleo, Kompleks Bumi Praja, Anduonohu, Kendari 93231

Telepon(0401) 3135289, 3135287

pos-el: kandaisultra@gmail.com

 



-->