ANALISIS KOHERENSI DALAM TOPIK FIKSI MINI  (Coherence Analysis in The Topic of Mini-Fiction)

Arini Vika Sari

doi:10.26499/jk.v18i1.3269

ANALISIS KOHERENSI DALAM TOPIK FIKSI MINI (Coherence Analysis in The Topic of Mini-Fiction)

Arini Vika Sari

Abstract

Mini-fiction is a modern prose that is present on Twitter with its uniqueness on the topics that are thrown at the readers. In fact, not all readers who provide comments follow the systematic writing of mini-fiction, whereas in terms of discourse integration, omission or differences in the title and the topic can be a problem. This study aims to analyze the coherence of comments given by readers on the topic of mini-fiction. This study uses a qualitative descriptive study using a critical discourse paradigm. The data source used was the @fiksimini account on Twitter during March 2020. Data collection was carried out using reading techniques and note-taking techniques in data cards. The data collection instrument is the researcher himself (human instrument) using the coherence relation parameter. The data analysis technique in this study used semantic and pragmatic equivalents in analyzing reader comments based on their coherence relationships. The data analysis stage was carried out in three stages, namely (1) word reduction; (2) data presentation; and (3) drawing conclusions. The results showed that the coherence between the topic of and readers' comments was 65.6%. The coherence relation tools found in the discourse are divided into (1) causation; (2) equations; (3) options; (4) conflict; (5) temporal; (6) objectives; (7) conditions; (8) comparison; (9) affirmation; (10) sequence; and (11) the situation

Fiksi mini merupakan prosa modern yang hadir di Twitter dengan keunikan pada topik yang dilempar kepada pembaca. Faktanya, tidak semua pembaca yang memberikan komentar mengikuti sistematis penulisan fiksi mini padahal dalam keterpaduan wacana, penghilangan atau perbedaan judul dengan topik dapat menjadi sebuah masalah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis koherensi komentar yang diberikan pembaca terhadap topik fiksi mini. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian deskripsi kualitatif dengan menggunakan paradigma wacana kritis. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah akun @fiksimini di Twitter selama bulan Maret 2020. Pengambilan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan teknik baca dan teknik catat dalam kartu data. Instrumen pengumpulan data adalah peneliti sendiri (human instrument) dengan menggunakan parameter relasi koherensi. Teknik analisis data pada penelitian ini menggunakan padan semantik dan pragmatik dalam menganalisis komentar pembaca berdasarkan relasi koherensinya. Tahap analisis data dilakukan dengan tiga tahap, yakni (1) reduksi kata; (2) penyajian data; dan (3) penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa koherensi antara topik dengan komentar pembaca sebesar 65,6 %. Piranti relasi koherensi yang ditemukan dalam wacana dibedakan atas (1) sebab-akibat; (2) persamaan; (3) pilihan; (4) pertentangan; (5) temporal; (6) tujuan; (7) syarat; (8) perbandingan; (9) penegas; (10) urutan; dan (11) situasi.

Keywords

coherence; mini-fiction topic; mini-fiction; discourse analysis; coherence relation; koherensi; topik fiksi mini; fiksi mini; analisis wacana; relasi koherensi

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Alba-Juez, L. (2016). Discourse analysis and pragmatics: Their scope and relation. Лаура Альба-Хуэс. Вестник РУДН. Серия: Лингвистика, 20(4), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312.

Alwi, H., Dardjowidjojo, S., Lapoliwa, H. & Moeliono, A.M., (2003). Tata bahasa baku bahasa Indonesia (Edisi Ketiga). Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Aquariza, N. R. (2018). Penguasaan kohesi dan koherensi dalam tulisan narasi siswa SMK di Surabaya. Jurnal Reforma, 7(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.30736/rfma.v7i1.40.

Asr, F. T., & Demberg, V. (2012). Implicitness of discourse relations. Proceedings of COLING 2012: Technical Papers, (December 2012), 2669–2684.

Bao-yu, N. (2015). Exploring image culture through narrative: A study on Jennifer Egan’s twitter fiction Black Box*. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 5(10), 820–829. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5836/2015.10.002.

Bateman, J. A., & Wildfeuer, J. (2014). A multimodal discourse theory of visual narrative. Journal of Pragmatics, 74, 180–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.001

Blair, S. J., Bi, Y., & Mulvenna, M. D. (2020). Aggregated topic models for increasing social media topic coherence. Applied Intelligence, 50(1), 138–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-019-01438-z.

Bouchardon, S. (2018). Mind the gap! 10 gaps for Digital Literature? Electronic Literature Organization 2018, 1–28. Retrieved from http://www.utc.fr/~bouchard/Bouchardon-ELO18-English.pdf.

Bouvier, G. (2020). From ‘Echo Chambers’ to ‘Chaos Chambers’: Discursive coherence and contradiction in the #MeToo twitter feed. Critical Discourse Studies, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1822898.

Brown, Gillian & George Yule. (1983). Analisis wacana. Cambridhe: Cambridge University Press.

Ciolfi, L., & Lockley, E. (2019). Exploring flash fiction for the collaborative interpretation of qualitative data. ECSCW 2019 - Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18420/ecscw2019_ep03.

Das, D., & Taboada, M. (2014). Signalling subject matter and presentational cohorence relations in discourse: A corpus study. LACUS Forum 40 (Proceedings of the 2013 LACUS Conference), 40(September), 1–12.

Dossoumou, A. M., & Mahugnon Severin Mehouenou Albert Omonlegbe Koukpossi. (2018). Appraising the impacts of cohesion and coherence in benin SS3 EFL learners’ writing productions: A linguistic perspective. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 4(5), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v4n5.293.

Elfiana, A., & Farkhan, M. (2019). Relasi koherensi wacana tulis: Studi kasus pada editorial koran The Jakarta Post. Buletin Al-Turas, 25(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v25i2.13299.

Ellis, C., Henderson, A., Wright, H. H., & Rogalski, Y. (2016). Global coherence during discourse production in adults: A review of the literature. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 00(0), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12213.

Endraswara, S. (2013). Metodologi penelitian sastra epistemologi, model, teori dan aplikasi. Yogyakarta: CAPS (Center for Academic Publishing Service).

Eskelinen, M. (2012). Cybertext poetics: International texts in critical media aesthetics. New York: Continuum.

F, Y. A., & Mahardika, R. Y. (2016). Analisis wacana kohesi dan koherensi pada wacana iklan politik dalam wacana pemilu 2014. P2M STKIP Siliwangi, 3(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.22460/p2m.v3i1p19-24.473.

Faiz, S. I., & Mercer, R. E. (2013). Identifying explicit discourse connectives in text. 64–76. Retrieved from http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/432/chp%3A10.1007%2F978-3-642-38457-8_6.pdf?auth66=1407165084_ba9bd7ec1b26f7ef85076fdafcc6a694&ext=.pdf.

Feng, V. W., Lin, Z., & Hirst, G. (2014). The impact of deep hierarchical discourse structures in the evaluation of text coherence. COLING 2014 - 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of COLING 2014: Technical Papers, 940–949.

Firman Tara, & Arjun, M. (2019). Jenis koherensi kalimat dalam rubrik crime story surat kabar Tribun Jambi edisi Maret 2019. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 3(2), 185–195. Retrieved from http://aksara.unbari.ac.id/index.php/aksara.

Giray, G., & Ünalır, M. O. (2019). Assessment of text coherence using an ontology-based relatedness measurement method. Expert Systems, 37(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12505.

Hayles, N. K. (2002). Writing machines. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.

Hidayat, A. N. (2017). Kalimat anomali dalam . Prosiding SETALI 2017 “Language Policy and Language Planning: Nationalism and Globalization,” (Setali), 46–50.

Hidayat Harifin, & Akbar, A. (2018). Rapresentasi generasi z pada novel taman sunyi sekala karya Aida Vyasa. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1–12.

Hoek, J., Zufferey, S., Evers-vermeul, J., & Sanders, T. J. M. (2017). Cognitive complexity and the linguistic marking of coherence relations: A parallel corpus study. Journal of Pragmatics, 121, 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.010.

Howitt-Dring, H. (2011). Making micro meanings: reading and writing microfiction. Short Fiction in Theory and Practice, 1(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1386/fict.1.1.47_1.

Jayanti, C. T. (2016). Wacana bahasa Indonesia: Analisis struktur, keterpaduan, permainan bahasa, dan fungsi. Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Pengajaran, 44(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.17977/um015v44i22016p175.

Kartikasari, R., Anoegrajekti, N., & Maslikatin, T. (2014). Realitas sosial dan representasi dalam tinjauan sosiologi sastra. Publika Budaya, 2(1), 50–57.

Keraf, Gorys. (2005). Komposisi. Semarang: Bina Putra.

KhosraviNik, M. (2017). Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS). In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies (Vol. 39, pp. 582–596). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342.

Kong, A. P. H., Linnik, A., Law, S. P., & Shum, W. W. M. (2018). Measuring discourse coherence in anomic aphasia using Rhetorical Structure Theory. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20(4), 406–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2017.1293158.

Latifah, A., & Triyono, S. (2020). Cohesion and coherence of discourse in the story of “Layangan Putus” on social media facebook. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 5(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v5i1.215.

Li, J., & Hovy, E. (2014). A model of coherence based on distributed sentence representation. EMNLP 2014 - 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference, 2039–2048. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/d14-1218.

Li, J., Li, R., & Hovy, E. (2014). Recursive deep models for discourse parsing. EMNLP 2014 - 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference, 2061–2069. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/d14-1220.

Louis, A., & Nenkova, A. (2012). A coherence model based on syntactic patterns. EMNLP-CoNLL 2012 - 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, Proceedings of the Conference, (July), 1157–1168.

Mak, W. M., & Sanders, T. J. M. (2012). The role of causality in discourse processing: Effects of expectation and coherence relations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(9), 1414–1437.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.708423.

Martinková, P. (2009). Coherence and cohesion in spoken and written discourse. Topics in Linguistics, 167–181. Retrieved from http://www.kaa.ff.ukf.sk/topics/issue4.pdf#page=95.

Merawati, F., & Suwartini, I. (2019). The discourse of cyber literature in Indonesia. 2nd Workshop on Language, Literature and Society for Education, 2–7. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-12-2018.2282796.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis second edition. SAGE Publications.

Mulder, G., & Sanders, T. J. M. (2012). Causal coherence relations and levels of discourse representation. Discourse Processes, 49(6), 501–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.692655.

Mulyana. (2005). Kajian wacana: Teori, metode, prinsip analisis wacana . Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016). Coherence threshold and the continuity of processing: The RI-Val model of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 53(5–6), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1123341.

Palma, D., & Atkinson, J. (2018). Coherence-based automatic essay assessment. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 33(5), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2018.2877278.

Rahman, F. (2017). Cyber literature: A reader – writer interactivity. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 3(4), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v3i4p156.

Renkema, Jan. (2004). Pengantar studi wacana. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Perusahaan Penerbit.

Rokib, M. (2012). Gerak komunitas di ruang siber. Jentera: Jurnal Kajian Sastra, 1(2), 48–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26499/jentera.v1i2.278.

Rosalita, E. (2014). Penerapan teknik menulis fiksi mini dalam pembelajaran menulis cerpen. Bahtera Bahasa: Antologi Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(1), 1–8. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upi.edu/Index.Php/Pspbsi/Article/View/427/0.

Sanz, A., & Romero, D. (2007). Literatures in the digital era: Theory and praxis. newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Setiawan, A. R. (2019). Biografi Clara Ng perempuan penulis asal Indonesia. (2004), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/nyrgq.

Shrivastava, D., Mishra, A., & Sankaranarayanan, K. (2018). Modeling topical coherence in discourse without supervision. 2, 1–9. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00410.

Somasundaran, S., Burstein, J., & Chodorow, M. (2014). Lexical chaining for measuring discourse coherence quality in test-taker essays. COLING 2014 - 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of COLING 2014: Technical Papers, 950–961.

Sumadi. (2017). Koherensi antarkalimat pada paragraf dalam wacana ilmiah Bahasa Jawa. Kandai, 13(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26499/jk.v13i1.102.

Ta’abudi, D. H. (2018). Model fiksi mini maroko dalam antologi “Ha’Al-Hurriyah” karya Ar-Rihani. LEKSEMA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 3(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.22515/ljbs.v3i1.1090.

Taboada, M., & De los Ángeles Gómez-González, M. (2012). Discourse markers and coherence relations: Comparison across markers, languages and modalities. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 6(1–3), 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v6i1-3.17.

Versley, Y., & Gastel, A. (2013). Linguistic tests for discourse relations in the TüBa-D/Z corpus of written German. Dialogue & Discourse, 4(2), 142–173. https://doi.org/10.5087/dad.2013.207.

Webber, B. (2012). Discourse structure and computation : Past , present and future. Proceedings of the ACL 2012 Workshop on Rediscovering 50 Years of Discoveries, 2(July), 42–54. Retrieved from http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/bonnie/final_discourse_50.pdf.

Widyaningrum, H. K. (2017). Analisis kohesi dan koherensi iklan dalam surat kabar Kompas. Bahtera, 4(7), 1–11.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37729/btr.v4i07.3655.

Zikánová, Š., Hajičová, E., Hladká, B., Jínová, P., Mírovský, J., Nedoluzhko, A., … Václ, J. (2015). Discourse and coherence from the sentence structure to relations in text (the 14th p; J. Hajič, Ed.). Prague: the Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics as the 14th publication in the series Studies in Computational and Theoretical Linguistics.

Zufferey, S., & Degand, L. (2013). Annotating the meaning of discourse connectives in multilingual corpora. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 13(2), 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2013-0022.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/jk.v18i1.3269