PEMBANGUNAN IDENTITAS MELALUI SAPAAN KEKERABATAN DI MASYARAKAT PINGGIRAN ANTARA BANDUNG DAN JATINANGOR

Lina Meilinawati Rahayu

Abstract


This paper aims to analyse and reveals how the construction of new identities in urban communities, on the outskirts of Bandung is displayed through kinship address terms. The theory used is Jenkins (2008) identity theory using Baurdrillard's (1983) perspective in seeing the relationship between reality, symbols, and society. Baudrillard explains that the typical character of today’s community is a simulation community. Furthermore, they are being explained as community who lives with crisscross code and signs. Hereafter, language, especially the address terms of kinship will be placed as a cultural discourse. The method used to see these cultural phenomena is literature and field studies. Field studies focused on distributing questionnaires to informants. Field data is then processed based on theories that have been obtained through literature study. The results of this study indicate that there is a shift in the function of kinship address terms from use-value to sign-value or symbol-value. Signs and values which consist of status, prestige, style expression, lifestyle, can be the main motives for the abovementioned changes kinship address terms.

 


Keywords


kinship address terms; identity; distinction; social status

Full Text:

PDF

References


Apriyani. (2015). Peran kelas menengah dalam menggerakan ekonomi, diperoleh dari http://infobanknews.com/peran-kelas-menengah-dalam-menggerakkan-ekonomi/.

Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulation. Semiotext(e): New York.

Barker, C. (2004). Cultural studies. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.

Haney, D. (1996). Lifestyles: Sebuah pengantar komprehensif. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.

Ferrer, R. C. (2011) The effect of prestige in language maintenance: The case of catalan in Valencia. Esuka – Jeful 2(1), 57—74.

Giles, Judi dan Tim Midleton. (1999). "Identityan Diference Studying Culture: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Hall, S. (2003). The work of representation dalam representation: Cultural representation and signifying practices. Ed. Stuart Hall. London: Sage Publication.

Jenkins, R. (2008). Social identity, third edition. Routledge. London and New York.

Jati, W. J. (2016). Kelas menengah dalam bingkai middle Indonesia. Jurnal Politik 1(2), 331—337.

Karman (2017). Bahasa dan kekuasaan (instrumen simbolik peraih kekuasaan versi Bourdieu). Jurnal Studi Komunikasi dan Media 21 (2), 235—246.

Kridalaksana, H. (1978). Fungsi dan sikap bahasa. Ende: Nusa Indah.

Lechte, J. (1994). Fifty key contemporary thinkers form stucturalism to postmodernity. Routledge: London, New York.

Nababan, P. W. J. (1993). Sosiolinguistik: suatu pengantar. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Nadar, F. X. (2009). Pragmatik dan penelitian pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Narwoko & Susanto. (2007). Sosiologi. Jakarta: Kencana.

Nizar, M. A. (tt). Kelas menengah (middle class) dan implikasinya bagi perekonomian Indonesia, diperoleh dari www.academia.edu/16807924.

Ohoiwatun, P. (2002). Sosiolinguistik: Memahami bahasa dalam konteks masyarakat dan kebudayaan. Jakarta: Visipro.

Pateda, M. (1978). Sosiolinguistik. Bandung: Angkasa.

Pride, J.B. & Holmes, J. (1979). Sociolinguistics. Penguin Books.

Sofyan, Nur. (2014). Bahasa sebagai simbolisasi mempertahankan kekuasaan. Jurnal Interaksi III(1), 75—84.

Thomas, L. & Wareing, S. (2007). Bahasa, masyarakat dan kekuasaan (terjemahan Sunoto, et.al.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Yunita, S. R. & Udarmoro W. (2016). Resistensi dan negosiasi individu: sebuah kajian identitas terhadap novel grafis persepolis karya marjene satrapi. Jurnal Kawistara, (3), 225--324.

Zhao, S. & Liu. (2010). Home language shift and its implications for language planning in singapore: From the perspective of prestige planning. De La Salle University Manila, 16(2), 111—126.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/und.v15i2.1728

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.